idsman75
I am in the Army. My parents live in Minnesota and I established residency in Iowa (voted, full-time job, residence, etc) before I enlisted. I currently do not have a physical residence in Iowa but claim Iowa for taxes and am registered to vote in Iowa. I do both and it is quite legal. I've already researched it.
I have recently learned that a simple piece of paper submitted to my Finance office where I am stationed can change my state of residency. The only physical permanant address that I can claim is in Minnesota and Minnesota does not assess state taxes from Active Duty servicemembers stationed outside the state of Minnesota. I would save about $1450/year by doing this at my current income tax bracket. The only drawback is that I would not be able to pursue my life passion of hunting deer in Iowa which I do annually without paying significant non-resident fees and would not have the hunting priviledges that I have as an Iowan.
Does this sound legal/legit? I can't seem to get a straight answer from anyone I talk to. My finance office and personnel office say "go for it" but I don't trust military HR or finance folks. I've seen to much typical government error, inefficiency and lack of expertise in both of those areas to feel comfortable.
I feel a bit of a drawback because I won't be able to hunt in Iowa anymore and I'm not quite sure if I want to retire in Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota or Nebraska 10 years from now. It will certainly be one of those.
Would this be legal/moral? I'm interested in opinions and anyone with the expertise or knowledge that might direct me to the correct Minnesota government office to get the straight scoop.
I have recently learned that a simple piece of paper submitted to my Finance office where I am stationed can change my state of residency. The only physical permanant address that I can claim is in Minnesota and Minnesota does not assess state taxes from Active Duty servicemembers stationed outside the state of Minnesota. I would save about $1450/year by doing this at my current income tax bracket. The only drawback is that I would not be able to pursue my life passion of hunting deer in Iowa which I do annually without paying significant non-resident fees and would not have the hunting priviledges that I have as an Iowan.
Does this sound legal/legit? I can't seem to get a straight answer from anyone I talk to. My finance office and personnel office say "go for it" but I don't trust military HR or finance folks. I've seen to much typical government error, inefficiency and lack of expertise in both of those areas to feel comfortable.
I feel a bit of a drawback because I won't be able to hunt in Iowa anymore and I'm not quite sure if I want to retire in Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota or Nebraska 10 years from now. It will certainly be one of those.
Would this be legal/moral? I'm interested in opinions and anyone with the expertise or knowledge that might direct me to the correct Minnesota government office to get the straight scoop.