Kiplinger.com Community - powered by vBulletin Kiplinger.com
Starting Out Investing Your Money Spending Wisley Your Retirement
Kiplinger.com Channels




Go Back   Kiplinger.com Community > TAXES
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-03-2008, 09:54 PM   #1
Sally03
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Question Divorced in 2007, now I must owe a penalty for underpayment of taxes?

I was divorced in 2007. I received $61,500 in alimony, and did not earn any wages since I am a full-time student. My adjusted gross income for 2007 is $57,611.

I did my tax return using TaxCut. A Form 2210, Underpayment of Estimated Tax by Individuals, Estates, and Trusts, was generated automatically. Using the Short Method of computing the penalty, the amount due is $381.

I have two questions:

1. For the 2006 tax year, I filed as Married Filing Jointly, and our total tax liability was $12,059. Because of the divorce and my subsequent filing as a single person in 2007, can I claim a Waiver to avoid the penalty?

2. If I must pay the penalty, do I have to file quarterly Estimated Tax Payments for 2008? My alimony for 2008 will be around $40,000. Should I base the estimated payments on this amount?

Thank you,
Sally
Sally03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 07:09 AM   #2
Puck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,084
I can't answer #1, but someone else will come along who can.

#2 -- yes, pay quarterly to avoid this problem! Another solution -- if you get even a part time job, have them withhold at a higher rate (for example, if you would normally claim a withholding allowance of one or two, do zero) -- that should help offset what you owe on the alimony income.
__________________
"Wealth is the slave of a wise man. The master of a fool." -- Seneca
Puck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 02:13 PM   #3
Sally03
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Puck,

Thank you. I will take your advice on item #2. Hope someone has an answer for #1 which is more pressing.

Sally
Sally03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 06:27 PM   #4
edcosoft
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
You can probably reduce that penalty substantially by using the Schedule AI of form 2210. This is because you probably received very little income in early quarters versuis lter quarters, thereby reducing the required installment in early quarters, and hence reducing the penalty.

For 2008 you can wither pay 1/4 of the amount of your 2007 tax, or use the AI Method again to calculate what you should pay each quarter.

An Excel spreadsheet program to calculate those AI quarterlies for either 2007 or 2008 is at www.edcosoft.com/qitc.html. It's free to download and try out and only $18 for the full year program if it's what you want. P.S. It's the only one avilable for a current year (2008) although Tax Cut should have offered to do it for 2007 for you free when you finished your 2007 return.
edcosoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:10 AM   #5
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
I am hoping this is a fairly simple tax question for circumstances that may seem complicated so here goes. I am recently divorced and now receiving SSD as a result of injuries sustained from having a spouse attempt to murder me in June of 2003. She ended up netting most of my net worth including retirement monies for this and as a result I've lost any additional savings in the process and the ensuing legal charade. I also have considerable debt that resulted from her actions and the courts and I refuse to pay it or bear the blot of bankruptcy for someone else's and the law's crimes. I had a supervisor assault me and nearly kill me while working at Raytheon in Tucson and they also won a court award and legal settlement against me for a retention bonus and relocation paid me despite Arizona DES paying my claim agreeing I resigned for cause. I paid the former spouse taxes on the blood monies paid her, and NY now filed a tax lien for a 401K disbursement that was overlooked on a return for TY 2003. I was basically homeless and near dead and had no way to manage any of this. She ended up with the whole amount anyway and I paid taxes to her on it. My questions are:

1) I understand that SSD is not garnishable, can the courts in Arizona or any creditors take savings or property to cover the debts and can they take interest earned on the SSD monies not spent each month? I essentially exhausted over $100K in credit and a perfect credit rating was destroyed in this mess as the courts held assets for too long and I was not able to work as a result of my injuries and the law did nothing to help.

2) Can NY sieze monies from the SSD monies paid me or the interest I accrue? And for both questions would a Roth IRA protect the gains and would I need to wait for the seasoning period of 5 years since I am already disabled?

I have no property or savings left that would predate the divorce or SSD award and the award was just made last month so I've had not much time to figure this out. I am appealing the NYS Tax lien since this really is not my tax bill but would like to back that up with something that is a little more definite since leaving the Fox to guard the hen house never worked as it seems and I don't trust NYS at all. If needed I'd move from here to protect my rights and if that meant moving just so not to pay NYS Tax ever again even on what little interest income I will make I'd do it in a heartbeat, assuming I still had one.

Terry Jones
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 12:34 PM   #6
1_more_opai
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: somewhere in texas
Posts: 1,455
wow. You seem to be one unfortunate dude. Actually, perhaps you are quite fortunate to still be alive. This is more a CPA question. Unlikely you are to get answer here, Luke.
__________________
1MO

disclaimer: "you didn't give me enough information to answer your question, so my answer might not be appropriate for you. in any case, don't take advice from me or anyone else on this board. it's not our life. it's not our money. you don't know who we are." "also, i am very arrogant. if your feelings were hurt in this message you probably need to get some thicker skin."

buy cheap term: www.i'm_a_dufus_for_clicking_here.com
1_more_opai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 08:43 PM   #7
clydewolf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,586
Terryallenjones,

I agree with 1_more_opai, You have had too many unfortuante circumstances/situations in your life. For some reason, you are still with us, and that is good.

Many states do not tax SS benefits. Here is a link:
http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/cgi-bin...li=&p_topview=1

Neither Arizona nor New York tax SS benefits. But interest earned on these benefits could be taxed if the interest plus your other income (not SS benefits) were high enough to go beyond the standard deduction.

Here is a link where you can determine if your income would be taxed by a state:
http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxes.html

An IRA will protect your money from creditors up to $1,000,000. That is while it is in the IRA. Once you take the money out of the IRA you should keep that money separate from all of your other monies so it is traceable to the IRA. Use a different bank account to receive the IRA money, and perhaps a different bank.

Distributions from a ROTH IRA come out in an manner ordered by law. First to be distributed is our Annual Contributions. Second to be distributed is Conversion Amounts, and last to be distributied from the ROTH IRA is gains.

We can take our annual contributions from our ROTH IRA at any time for any reason without tax or penalty.
Converted amounts need to be in the ROTH IRA for 5 years, then they can be distributed without tax or penalty. Taking the conversion amounts from the ROTH IRA during the 5 year clock, may result in a penalty. You can use one of the accepted exceptions to avoid the penalty during this time. Each Conversion Amount has it's own 5 year clock.

Gains distributed from the ROTH IRA may be subject to tax and penalty. Taxes and penalty will generally apply if the IRA owner is younger than age 59.5 years. Using one of the accepted exceptions to the penalty would void the penalty, but taxes would remain an obligation of the IRA owner. At age 59.5 years all distributions from the ROTH IRA are free from tax and penalty.
clydewolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:39 AM   #8
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Thanks 1_more_opai you are right and it has been a tough go that is for sure. This has nearly cost me my life more than once and everything that working my entire life, over 20 years, as a Sr. Software Engineer would provide. That and I can't work now which is more tragedy. And this is the divorce law in this country, it is insane. The women get away with murder and I have to pay for it? It makes no sense at all. This is why I'll never remarry and have no faith in our government or the Police and wonder now why I ever paid taxes in the first place. They did nothing for me. I see all these laws and really ask you these questions but know full well none of these will be followed and the banks, IRS, and any tax authority can and have done whatever they want but I thought I would at least try and see.

An example comes to mind and recently I returned to E*TRADE brokerage since I now have assets again and opened an account with them prior to moving back to NY. They claimed they opened a checking and brokerage accounts and mailed me checks and Visa card and accepted my $4,000.00 deposit. They waited for me to begin moving and I am glad I did not sit in California waiting for them to mail things to me because they were never sent. Once I made it here to NY I find they decided to close my account and then refused to return my deposit expecting me to notarize some document, keep in mind I am handicapped, and have been homeless from this, also poor since I had no assets for over 2 years, and they retain the first SSD monies I receive and fail to return it. The point is that once someone has your money, you may never see it again and the courts here are worthless, you will never ever ever accomplish anything with them our your government. Anybody that has someone murder him in his own home, and then has to pay her for it, will never get any protection under the law or the courts. I'll give my money to someone else and if I need to leave NY to not pay them one more cent in taxes I will do that also. Thanks again for your kind comments and the suggestions.

Terry
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:46 AM   #9
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Clydewolf,

Thanks and I'd say you are right, this was much too much and I would never have guessed that this could happen in the good old US of A. I would never have married had I known that she would do this as she had planned, black widow is the term, I have others, and that it was possible she'd get away with it as she has. The State of NY sponsored my death at her hand and it was premeditated. Sickening.

Thank you for your help and that seems to make sense. I have no prior conversions or existing funds at all since I've been basically destitute thanks to my former spouse and the courts so any money that goes into the Roth would be Social Security SSD amounts and hence I'd expect from what you say, not taxed, sheltered, and can be used at any time, is that correct then? I had planned to keep it at one brokerage house and just use the funds from there. I am disabled so the age restriction should not apply if I read that correctly?

Thanks Again,
Terry Jones
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 11:48 AM   #10
clydewolf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,586
Terryallenjones,

You need earned incme to make an IRA contribution.

You appear to understand the workings of a ROTH IRA.

For more information regarding IRAs read IRS Pub 590, Individual Retirement Arrangements.
clydewolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 06:49 PM   #11
lifesaver00
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 5
I know someone in a similar situation and she had to contact a CPA to figure the whole thing out. I suggest you look into the same just to be on the safe side.
__________________
Types of Life Insurance
lifesaver00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2009, 08:54 PM   #12
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Really? I find it hard to believe that a woman went through half of what was done to me AND lost ANY money in a divorce? Isn't it assumed that the women can get away with murder and profit from it? I don't know of anyone that ever was able to divorce and keep anything other than my ex-wife's first husband who has something like four lawyers in his family without her getting all of it for some reason.

This leads into my next question regarding rights of survivorship and family property. Since my parents were complicit in the murder attempts, and are yet to be charged with any crime and we of course are now estranged, as are me and my sister and brother in-law, how does one ensure his, what I'd assume is a birthrite to 1/2 of my parent's estate since much of this was a property grab by my sibling and former spouse who wanted to render me incompetent and reap the rewards of all of this. Believe it or not, these people are this cold and I finally figured out what was happening here. Essentially how do I ensure I receive 1/2 of the $500,000.0 property and other assets given I am not going to be around, in a different sense than was planned, to see to it the will is executed on my behalf? Fun stuff isn't this?


http://www.terryallenjones.org

Terry Jones
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 12:27 AM   #13
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
And there are no life savers here, that is just kid stuff and more eye candy I don't need. I nearly died a dozen times from just the financial harm caused me, ended up homeless, and this is even modulo the harm caused by the murder attempts. I used to make six figures and lost it all....
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 01:11 AM   #14
terryallenjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
I get tired of the Shills.
terryallenjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 07:12 PM   #15
clydewolf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by terryallenjones
Essentially how do I ensure I receive 1/2 of the $500,000.0 property and other assets given I am not going to be around, in a different sense than was planned, to see to it the will is executed on my behalf? Fun stuff isn't this?


http://www.terryallenjones.org

Terry Jones

Terryallenjones,

We may have no right to any of our parents assets.
Your parents are in control of their assets. They will assign beneficiaries to life insurance, retirement benefits, and other assets as they see fit. If they own realestate, they can name someone to receive it in their will.

If your parents have not named beneficiaries, or have no will, the state where they reside or own property has a will for them. In this situation, upon the death of your parents you could receive a portion of their assets as determined by state law.
clydewolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
401(k) to Roth Rollover: When do I pay taxes? hunter74 RETIREMENT 5 02-15-2008 02:53 PM
Income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes etc are not sufficient? jhonsmith42 TAXES 5 10-30-2007 07:48 AM
Sheltering income from 2007income tax for 409A forced buy/sell non-qual stock options dsouder TAXES 0 07-24-2007 10:21 AM
Advice Needed: Should I transfer funds from Traditional IRA to ROTH IRA in 2007? MrMe RETIREMENT 6 01-19-2007 08:12 PM
Corporation sole: legit or another tax scam? kirkguardian TAXES 6 12-20-2005 06:28 AM

SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.