Kiplinger.com Community - powered by vBulletin Kiplinger.com
Starting Out Investing Your Money Spending Wisley Your Retirement
Kiplinger.com Channels




Go Back   Kiplinger.com Community > STOCKS
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-19-2004, 02:23 PM   #1
MadPoet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Va Beach, VA
Posts: 79
Retained Earnings

There is an entry on the Balance Sheet called 'Retained Earnings'.

Can anybody tell me what it is all about, and how important it is?
__________________
MadPoet
MadPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2004, 03:18 PM   #2
TJB_NC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 359
Mad Poet

Retained earnings are defined as earnings that are retained by the company as opposed to being distributed to shareholders via dividends.

By retaining earnings, the company has the ability to reinvest those earnings or otherwise use those earnings to improve the company.

Obviously earnings that are distributed to shareholders are no longer available to the company, and reflect a belief - perhaps - that the shareholder knows better what to do with the money that the company has earned through its operations.

There are some investment camps that put considerable emphasis on retained earnings - read, for example, Marty Whitman's thoughts on value investing.

Others, of course, seem to want companies to distribute as much of the earnings as possible to the shareholders (I tend to think that if someone doesn't think the company knows what to do with the money it is making, he/she may want to find another company in which to invest).

Of course, certain asset subclasses, such as REITs, are required by law to distribute a set percentage of earnings to shareholders.

It can actually be a great point to consider, and the level of importance that someone puts on retained earnings can tell quite a bit about that person's investment philosophy.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

TJ
TJB_NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2004, 02:01 PM   #3
MadPoet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Va Beach, VA
Posts: 79
Dear TJ,
Thanks. I have not quite decided on a 'level of importance' for retained earnings . . . but that was one of the things I found 'enlightening' when I went to find out why CMS Energy was such a loser - especially as compared to Dominion Resources (D) and WPS. (D and WPS had positive earnings, and a nice positive retained earnings while CMS had negative retained earnings as well as negative earnings. It seems a couple of sites were also lying about CMS's earnings - the liars were saying CMS had positive earnings and a low P/E ratio when, in fact, CMS had been losing money the last three years. I was very peeved when I figured it out.)
__________________
MadPoet
MadPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2004, 08:35 AM   #4
TJB_NC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 359
Retained Earnings and Utes

MadPoet

By my view, you have to look at retained earnings a little bit differently in regards to utilities with regulated businesses. The regulated business model does not put a premium on capital reinvestment, so that the dividend payout is more important for shareholder return. In that regards, the payout ratio (dividend/earnings) might be a more important parameter in assessing how "safe" the dividend is. Of course, with the mix of regulated and nonregulated businesses that most utes now engage in, this concept is a bit fuzzier than it was in the days prior to deregulation.

And, I think you have to look past the retained earnings question in comparing D and WPS with CMS. I don't know the full histories so someone might find it easy to correct me here, but I think CMS made the decision back in the hey-day of dereg and energy marketing to take on a huge level of debt to become a primary generator of power to be sold into the freer market. The trouble is there is now a lot of overcapacity, and those utes who sought to become primary generators are having as many problems in debt servicing as those companie that embarked on energy trading. D and WPS maintained very different models than CMS during that period of time, which proved - so far - to be the right decision.

TJ
TJB_NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2004, 12:54 PM   #5
RSLockett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10
I would add to the previous posts that it is important to keep in mind that while retained earnings represent the accumulation of net income over time, it does not necessarily follow that there is cash available to make future distributions of that income.
RSLockett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
social security and work earnings ftsoft RETIREMENT 5 11-26-2004 08:24 PM
Roth IRA - Open with Student Earnings?? J77Z RETIREMENT 2 11-09-2004 08:13 AM
P to E Ratio Bear STOCKS 3 03-02-2004 12:26 PM
earnings reports dog lover STOCKS 1 01-04-2003 10:06 PM
Earnings on Coverdell IRA lafever Coverdell Education Savings Accounts 4 04-22-2002 10:45 AM

SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.