|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
|
Mutual Fund vs. ETF in IRA
Hello,
I am a 20 something so my current portfolio consists of low-cost, no load, mutual funds with heavy stock holdings. When ETF's became the "it" item on Wall St., I figured they would fizzle out in a couple months. However, they are still being preached by many as great investments due to super low costs, and tax efficiency. I am left scratching my head because if you take the simplest, most basic chart (I use yahoo) and compare a popular broad market ETF (I used SPY and Vangaurd's VTI) to low-cost, no load mutual funds (FAIRX, DODFX, RYVPX, CGMFX, etc.), the no-load, low-cost mutual funds always OBLITERATE the ETF's (I'm looking at ranges over 2 years, since I have a long-term perspective). If you compare both said market-broad ETF's from inception they actually lose out against the DOW as a whole. So, why would anyone in their 20's, 30's, and even 40's ever invest in ETF's (sector play aside). If they want a piece of the broad market, no-load mutual funds with a good manager seem to be the best bet, unless I'm totally mising something obvious here? Thanks much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 124
|
You make very good points. I agree with you. ETFs are a good tool for sector play.
Some also think of the them as a good choice if you're afraid of making a bad mutual fund choice. The ETF is a picture of a broad sector, minus the fee. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why prefer Mutual Fund Investments | franklin001 | FUNDS | 6 | 10-14-2008 01:59 PM |
| Harrassment and threats from Washington Mutual | Unregistered | BOILING POINT | 8 | 12-15-2007 02:29 PM |
| Tax implications on mutual fund exchanges | PCSnoop | Gains and Losses | 3 | 08-04-2006 04:55 PM |